Skip to content
← All articles

Editorial standards

How we write, source, and update articles on the Vertana blog.

Who writes these articles

Every post is published under the team byline The Vertana Team. We do not use named individual authors or personal headshots on the blog. Vertana builds AI-resistant skills assessments for hiring teams. We write about what we learn from designing assessments, running them on our platform, and curating our question library.

How we source claims

  • Factual claims about hiring science, law, or industry practice include a citation in the Sources section at the end of the article, or are rewritten as clearly labelled opinion.
  • We do not invent statistics, study results, or quotations. If we cannot verify a source, we leave it out or mark it for revision.
  • Original figures come only from Vertana's own systems (for example, question-library composition) and are labelled as such.

Updates and corrections

Each article shows a Published date and an Updated date when the content has changed materially. Significant corrections include a note on the article page explaining what changed.

Product mentions

Some articles describe how Vertana implements the practices we recommend. Product references appear after the advice stands on its own and include a disclosure line. A reader who never uses Vertana should still leave with something actionable.

What we will not publish

  • Anonymous quotations presented as expert testimony
  • Unverified legal advice stated as certainty
  • Statistics without a traceable source
  • Thin content below our editorial minimum for the topic

Contact

Spotted an error or have a source we should add? Email [email protected] with the article URL and we will review it.

This page is linked from every article byline. Path: /blog/editorial-standards